Adam Schiff has spent years positioning himself as a defender of national security.
The California Democrat built his entire political brand around protecting classified information from bad actors.
But a Democrat whistleblower gave the FBI one eyewitness account about Adam Schiff that exposed his real agenda.
Democrat intelligence officer witnessed Schiff’s leak authorization
According to Solomon, the whistleblower had spent twelve years working for House Intelligence Committee Democratic staff before approaching the FBI.¹
The whistleblower didn’t just hear rumors or second-hand gossip.
He was sitting in the room when it happened.
According to investigative reporter John Solomon’s bombshell report on Hannity, the whistleblower provided eyewitness testimony that Schiff authorized the leaking of classified secrets specifically to damage Donald Trump.¹
"This whistleblower literally sat in a meeting, he says, he tells the FBI, where Adam Schiff authorized the leaking of classified secrets to dirty up Donald Trump and to try to build towards either a select committee in Congress or a special prosecutor," Solomon explained.¹
The whistleblower wasn’t some partisan hack looking to settle scores.
This was a dozen-year veteran of the House Intelligence Committee Democratic staff who felt compelled to blow the whistle on his own party’s ranking member.
The timing tells you everything about Schiff’s strategy.
Schiff’s calculated plan to destroy Trump from day one
The whistleblower’s account reveals that Schiff’s anti-Trump campaign wasn’t reactive – it was premeditated.
Starting in 2017, just months after Trump took office, Schiff was already orchestrating a comprehensive plan to use classified information as a political weapon.
The goal wasn’t national security or protecting America’s secrets.
Schiff wanted to build momentum for either hauling Trump before a congressional select committee or getting a special prosecutor appointed.
The FBI received detailed testimony through multiple interviews, but the Justice Department chose not to pursue charges.¹
He didn’t just make vague accusations.
He gave the FBI specifics about meetings, participants, and exactly what Schiff authorized.
But here’s where the story gets even more disturbing.
FBI had the evidence but Justice Department buried it
The FBI received comprehensive evidence from a credible Democratic source about serious violations of the Espionage Act.
They had an eyewitness.
They had detailed testimony.
They had four separate interviews worth of evidence.
And they did absolutely nothing with it.
"In the case of Adam Schiff, they got to the bottom of some classified leaks, but the Justice Department chose not to act," Solomon reported.¹
This wasn’t a case of insufficient evidence or unclear jurisdiction.
The Justice Department simply decided to take a pass on prosecuting one of their political allies.
"How many times have we sat around in the last decade and heard, we’re going to get to the bottom of that classified leak, and then a few months later, we couldn’t get to the bottom of that classified leak?" Solomon asked.¹
But in Schiff’s case, they did get to the bottom of it.
They just chose to ignore what they found.
The two-tier justice system in action
The contrast couldn’t be more stark when you compare how the Justice Department handled allegations against Schiff versus how they’ve pursued Trump and his associates.
Solomon also noted the contrast with Trump’s impeachment: "Wasn’t it a hearsay so-called whistleblower that led to the entire Ukrainian impeachment?" Hannity asked. "Yeah. Yeah, exactly. And it turns out that what he described in the call wasn’t actually an accurate description of what happened," Solomon replied.¹
In that case, Democrats treated hearsay as gospel and demanded immediate action.
But when a Democratic whistleblower provided first-hand, eyewitness testimony about Adam Schiff violating the Espionage Act, the same Justice Department that was investigating Trump for classified document issues suddenly developed amnesia.
The whistleblower who testified against Trump wasn’t even in the room for the call he described.
The whistleblower who testified against Schiff was sitting right there when Schiff authorized the leaks.
Guess which one led to investigations and which one was buried?
More explosive revelations coming
According to Solomon, "The good news is that Kash Patel has gotten these documents to Congress."¹
Solomon revealed this is part of a larger pattern: "By the way, this is the first of several major leak investigations we’re going to see over the next several days. You’re going to see other major people that were clearly identified by the FBI as having leaked classified secrets."¹
The pattern is clear: Democrat officials leak classified information for political purposes, their own staff members report them to the FBI, the FBI investigates and finds evidence, and then the Justice Department quietly shelves the cases.
It’s been a systematic protection racket for Democrat politicians who weaponized America’s intelligence apparatus against their political opponents.
The question now is whether anything changes under President Trump’s Justice Department.
Schiff built his career on hypocrisy
Adam Schiff spent years lecturing Americans about the sanctity of classified information and the dangers of unauthorized leaks.
He positioned himself as the responsible adult in the room, warning that Trump’s handling of sensitive information posed a threat to national security.
All while orchestrating his own classified leak operation designed to destroy a sitting President.
The whistleblower’s account reveals that Schiff’s entire anti-Trump narrative was built on information he knew was obtained through illegal leaks that he personally authorized.
This wasn’t about protecting America.
It was about protecting Adam Schiff’s political career and advancing the Democrat Party’s resistance agenda.
Now we know that when Schiff was pounding the podium about classified information violations, he was projecting.
Every time he accused Trump of mishandling secrets, he was describing his own conduct.
The American people deserve accountability for this systematic abuse of our intelligence systems for partisan political purposes.
The question is whether they’ll finally get it.
¹ Sean Hannity, "John Solomon: Whistleblower Warned FBI That Adam Schiff Authorized Leaking Classified Information To Smear Trump," Fox News, August 11, 2025.
