The Presidential debate on ABC News was a travesty.
But there was more happening behind the scenes than anyone realized.
And a top Clinton advisor demanded one investigation into the debate that stunned everyone.
Donald Trump had the Presidential debate rigged against him
Republican Presidential candidates go into any debate knowing that the moderators are in the Democrat candidate’s corner.
ABC News watched President Joe Biden’s more than 50-year political career go down in flames during the June Presidential debate.
The network was determined not to let the same thing happen to Vice President Kamala Harris.
Former President Donald Trump found himself in a three-on-one contest against Kamala and the two moderators during the ABC News Presidential debate.
Moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis – a sorority sister of Kamala – might as well have been decked out in Kamala campaign hats and t-shirts.
They stepped in with false fact-checks to protect Kamala and to discredit Trump to the audience.
ABC rigged the debate against Trump with the highly Parisian moderators.
The “fact checks” that ABC’s moderators used turned out to be completely false on further examination.
Muir chimed in to tell Trump that the FBI’s data showed that crime was dropping during the Biden-Harris administration.
Days later, Biden’s Justice Department released crime statistics that Trump was right and violent crime was up.
These phony “fact checks” were employed throughout the debate on a variety of topics.
Kamala never received a fact check despite playing fast and loose with the truth.
Clinton pollster demands an investigation into ABC News debate
Democrat pollster Mark Penn – who worked for former President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton – was outraged by what he saw during the ABC News debate.
He called on ABC to launch an internal investigation to determine if the debate was rigged.
“I actually think they should do a full internal investigation, hire an outside law firm,” Penn said on the John Solomon Reports podcast. “I don’t know how much of this was planned in advance.”
Penn said the one-sided fact-checking of the debate was outrageous.
“I don’t know what they told the Harris campaign,” Penn stated. “I think the day after, suspicion here is really quite high, and I think a review of all their internal texts and emails really should be done by an independent party to find out to what extent they were planning on, in effect, you know, fact-checking just one candidate and in effect, rigging the outcome of this debate. I think the situation demands nothing less than that.”
Kamala’s campaign tried to invert reality by portraying her as the change candidate and casting Trump as the incumbent.
Penn thought that she was succeeding at the effort with the help of the media propaganda effort backing her campaign.
“It’s a 50-50, race. He’s [Trump] got more obvious tools to get across the finish line than she does and part of the thing here is that if the referees have their finger on the scale, it’s harder to, you know, breakthrough and overcome. And certainly, general media coverage has been fairly laughable,” Penn explained.
The media has made it their mission to put Kamala Harris in the winner’s circle on Election Day.
Stay tuned to Unmuzzled News for any updates to this ongoing story.
