Donald Trump has been the target of unprecedented law fare.
The Democrats are determined to punish him with endless prosecutions and lawsuits.
And one judge with Trump’s fate in her hands did something truly jaw-dropping.
CO Trump case judge made a wild claim about Lauren Boebert, but that’s not even the half of it
Activist Democrat judges are presiding over Donald Trump cases in multiple jurisdictions.
In the state of Colorado, Democrats are attempting to have Trump removed from the ballot.
Democrats and some Never Trumpers have argued that Trump should not even be allowed to run for President in 2024 because he incited an “insurrection,” and Colorado Democrats are putting that novel legal theory to the test.
And District Court Judge Sarah Wallace, the judge presiding over the Colorado case, donated to an anti-Trump PAC called the Colorado Turnout Project.
Worse yet, Judge Wallace refused to recuse herself from the case.
The Colorado Turnout Project wrote on its website that it formed “shortly after Colorado Republicans refused to condemn the political extremists who stormed the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. In fact, Republican Representative Lauren Boebert (CO-3) even encouraged the violence. The Colorado Turnout Project aims to prevent violent insurrections by addressing this problem at its source– if we vote out pariahs like Representative Boebert, we can turn CO Blue once and for all.”
This is the “justice” system in Colorado and so many other Democrat-dominated jurisdictions
So a judge who believes that Trump fomented an insurrection will be presiding over a case, determining whether or not Trump can be removed from the ballot for fomenting an insurrection.
The bias is blinding, yet Judge Wallace remains on the case.
Mike Davis of the Article III Project, a group that advocates for constitutionalist judges, explained, “Judge Wallace previously rejected all of Trump’s legal arguments, including the only way to disqualify for insurrection under the Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is to win a federal criminal conviction under the federal insurrection criminal statute Congress passed to execute Section 3. Will the public reasonably believe she can give Trump a fair January 6th-related bench trial after she donated to an anti-Trump January 6th PAC? The answer is clearly not. This is the reversible error.”
🚨
New Denver District Judge Sarah Wallace, a Democrat Donor, Commits Reversible Error By Refusing to Recuse from Trump January 6th Case After Donating to Anti-Trump January 6th PAC
1. On August 18, 2022, Democrat Governor Jared Polis appointed Democrat donor Sarah Wallace as… pic.twitter.com/6n6UVffsaX
— 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) October 30, 2023
Wallace isn’t the only activist judge deciding Trump’s legal future.
Judge Arthur Engoron is presiding over the outrageous fraud lawsuit brought against Trump in New York.
Trump told a gaggle of reporters, “We’re going to be here for months with a judge that already made up his mind. It’s ridiculous. He’s a Democrat judge. He’s an operative. And it’s ridiculous. Other than that, things went very well.”
Lawfare in and of itself is a punishment, and the Democrats know that.
Stay tuned to Unmuzzled News for any updates to this ongoing story.
